Monday, November 14, 2011

With my last post, I leave you all with this....


Why is pharmacy informatics important?

Although still an emerging field, the continued development and integration of technology into health systems will further expand the role of informatics and informatics pharmacists in health care organizations of all sizes.
New technologies to advance patient care and promote the effective delivery of health care services are always being developed. Informatics pharmacists are at the forefront of efforts to refine and improve currently available systems and encourage the creation of newer and even more efficient methods to achieve safer and more effective medication usage.
The use of technologies such as CPOE, BCMA, clinical decision support, robotics, automated dispensing cabinets, intelligent infusion devices and telepharmacy has grown exponentially in the last decade. Such innovations represent a splendid opportunity for the trained informatics pharmacist to integrate his or her clinical skills with knowledge of technology and information systems to improve and streamline the medication use process.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding and the Meaningful Use discussion have brought considerable attention to the issue of integrating technology into health care delivery. Demand for trained informatics professionals is growing, because implementation of systems such as CPOE and BCMA has accelerated.
Pharmacy students who enjoy working with technology, are detail oriented and who are interested in creating and developing innovations to improve patient care may wish to consider a career in pharmacy informatics. The ideal candidate will be able to integrate his or her understanding of technology with his clinical knowledge to be not only a champion for patient career, but also an advocate for the clinicians who use health care information technology systems.

http://studentdoctor.net/2010/12/career-spotlight-pharmacy-informatics/

Use of pharmacy informatics resources by clinical pharmacy services in acute care hospitals

  1. Gregory T. Matsuura and 
  2. Douglas L. Weeks
+Author Affiliations
  1. GREGORY T. MATSUURA, PHARM.D., BCPS, is Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University (WSU), Spokane, and Clinical Pharmacist, Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital, Yakima, WA. DOUGLAS L. WEEKS, PH.D., is Research Professor, Department of Pharmacotherapy, WSU, and Senior Research Investigator, Inland Northwest Health Services, Spokane.
  1. Address correspondence to Dr. Matsuura at Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital, 2811 Tieton Drive, Yakima, WA 98902 (matsuurg@wsu.edu).

Abstract

Purpose. The use of pharmacy informatics resources by clinical pharmacy services and the presence of a pharmacy informatics specialist in acute care hospitals were evaluated.
Methods. Two hundred randomly selected pharmacies in general medical and surgical hospitals in the United States with at least 100 acute care beds were surveyed via mail. Survey items gathered information regarding facility attributes, opinions about staff pharmacists’ understanding of information technology, and departmental utilization of pharmacy informatics.
Results. Of the 200 surveys mailed, 114 (57%) were returned completed. When asked to rate their departments’ use of pharmacy informatics, 82% indicated that pharmacy informatics use was good or fair, while 12% considered information use to be optimized. A majority of respondents (60%) indicated that a pharmacy informatics specialist was employed within the pharmacy, with 47% indicating that the specialist was a pharmacist. An overwhelming percentage of these pharmacists received informatics training on the job, and roughly half had specialty positions integrated into their pharmacist job description. No significant association existed between the use of pharmacy informatics and facility teaching status (teaching versus nonteaching), geographic location (urban versus rural), or use of computerized prescriber order entry. Employment of a pharmacy informatics specialist was significantly associated with the use of such informatics applications as database mining, renal-dosing-rules engines, antibiotic–pathogen matching-rules engines, and pharmacokinetic-monitoring rules engines.
Conclusion. The use of clinical pharmacy informatics in patient care in acute care hospitals with at least 100 beds was significantly more likely when a pharmacy informatics specialist was present in the pharmacy. However, 4 in 10 hospital pharmacies did not employ a pharmacy informatics specialist.
Index terms:
http://www.ajhp.org/content/66/21/1934.short

An Incremental Pharmacy Informatics Model for Use in a Rural Hospital
Douglas A. Talbert, PhD,* Edward Roush, BS,* Luis Velazco, BS,* and Casey White, PharmD
*Dept. of Computer Science, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN
 Dept. of Pharmacy, Cookeville Regional Medical Center, Cookeville, TN
Abstract
We present an implementation model for pharmaceutical computerized decision support (CDS) that enables a hospital to incrementally target specific “high value” projects as needs are identified and support is secured. Our model, which we are currently implementing in a rural medical center, allows the hospital and its staff to quickly reap some benefits from CDS in spite of resource limitations.
Introduction
Limitations in financial, staff, and information technology resources in rural hospitals make the implementation of computerized decision support (CDS) tools difficult to justify.1 In our case, resource limitations at Cookeville Regional Medical Center (CRMC), a 247-bed hospital in rural Tennessee, hindered the implementation an intravenous-to-oral (IV-to-PO) conversion protocol, in spite of the known benefits of such a tool.2
Prior experience with an incremental approach to implementing pharmacy informatics3 indicated that, once embedded, a tool capable of electronically reviewing orders can support the addition of new decision-support functionality with little demand on resources. Whereas a need to be responsive to an evolving understand of needs motivated [3], a similar model enables a kind of bootstrap approach to CDS in which the savings achieved by the initial effort provide resources that can be used to justify and support the implementation of subsequent functionality. This ability to implement CDS in small increments as justified by a cost-benefit analysis is well suited to rural hospitals.
Model Description
The basic model consists of four elements – (1) sources of patient-specific data, (2) a knowledgebase, (3) an order review tool, and (4) a reporting mechanism. While a relative small team can construct the initial knowledgebase, order review tool, and reporting mechanism, access to accurate and comprehensive patient data in an electronic format may be more difficult to accomplish. Additionally, since we are focused on resource-limited situations, new large-scale data acquisition efforts are unlikely. Thus, the content of existing data repositories will probably dictate which CDS functions are possible. One should also consider the cost-benefit tradeoffs associated with the possible CDS options.
Prior to the initiation of our project, CRMC determined the financial benefits of more effectively transitioning patients from IV antibiotics to PO antibiotics and developed a protocol for determining which patient are likely candidates for that transition. A manual review of all patients by a clinical pharmacist, however, was too time-consuming.
After a brief analysis, we determined that electronic access to most, but not all, of the patient-specific data required to make IV-to-PO recommendations was available, and since that data was adequate to produce a list small enough for the hospital’s clinical pharmacist to manually review within a reasonable amount of time, we concluded that IV-to-PO conversion was an appropriate choice for our initial CDS effort.
Model Implementation
An ability to evolve the functionality as new data sources and needs dictate changes drove many of our design decisions. A layered architecture consisting of a data layer, a data abstraction layer, and a presentation layer helps isolate changes as the IT environment evolves. Furthermore, we designed all the project-specific components (the knowledgebase, the order review tool, and the reporting mechanism) with extensibility in mind. For example, designing each piece of CDS functionality as a separate encapsulated unit reduces the likelihood that new functionality will introduce regression faults. Thus, we pay special attention to coupling and cohesion issues during the software design process to ensure appropriate encapsulation.
Conclusions
We believe this adaptation of a proven incremental model can serve as a good model for CDS implementation in resource-limited situations such as rural hospitals.
References
1. Frisse ME, Metzer J. Information technology in the rural setting: challenges and more challenges.JAMIA. 2005;12:99–100.
2. Teich JM, et al. An Information system to promote intravenous-to-oral medication conversion. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:415–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Talbert DA, Hargrove F. Embedding drug dispensing logic to provide a more intelligent clinician order entry/pharmacy interface. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Robots taking over = More time for MTM by Pharmacists.

UCSF's robotic pharmacy automatically distributes medication, scrutinizes human error (video)



Robots are slowly taking over the world, right? Well, their latest conquest is the pharmacy. The UCSF Medical Center has implemented three robotic pill-dispensing machines that handle and prepare medication that's dangerous to the common human. The process works as follows: doctor writes a prescription, hospital clerk sends it over to pharmacist, pharmacist enters slip into the computer, robot picks up it and does the dirty work. The automated machine will grab the proper dosage, package it and slap a label indicating instructions and patient info. Rather than fearing for their jobs (or lives), the folks at the UCSF at are excited about this robot-takeover 'cause it increases the time care-givers spend with patients while allowing pharmacists to work more efficiently with physicians in determining what medication to supply. The most impressive thing, we think, is that our robot pals have not had a single error since preparing 350,000 doses of meds. Take that, meatbags!
http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/10/ucsfs-robotic-pharmacy-automatically-distributes-medication-sc/?asid=c7e80c0d

Drug Vending Machines?!?!

Drug vending machines start trial in UK, allow awkward videophone conversations with your pharmacist

You've got to imagine the Japanese are green with envy right now, as the BBC report not one, but two different drug vending machines are being tested out under Her Majesty's watchful eye. The first of these experiments is run by supermarket chain Sainsbury's, which has installed a pair of drug dispenser machines in its stores. They identify users by their fingerprint or a unique number, demand PIN verification too, and then finally accept your prescription. Then -- and this is the really silly part -- a pharmacist comes along, picks up your prescription, fills it out, and deposits it in the machine for you to pick up. So it's impersonal and unnecessarily convoluted, great. PharmaTrust seems to have a slightly better idea with its videophone-equipped, ATM-style robo-vendor: it's intended to allow pharmacists to approve prescriptions off-site and out of usual working hours by letting them speak to you via videophone. It could in fact be a big benefit in more remote areas, depending on how patients take to it -- we'll know more when the trial starts up in participating hospitals this winter.



http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/16/drug-vending-machines-start-trial-in-uk-allow-awkward-videophon/

Thursday, October 6, 2011

"Next Stop: Self Service Pharmacy at CVS?"


$1 chip tests for HIV in 15 minutes flat, fits in your wallet

Getting tested for STDs used to mean a doctor's visit, vials of blood, and days, weeks, or even months ofanxiously waiting for results. mChip aims to change all that, while simultaneously ridding your brain of viable excuses not to get tested. It works as such: one drop of blood goes on the microfluidics-based optical chip, 15 minutes pass, and boom, the AmEx-sized device will confirm whether or not you have syphilis and / or HIV. The bantam gizmo is practically foolproof, as reading the results doesn't require any human interpretation whatsoever. Plus, it's cheap -- cheaper than a coffee at Starbucks. One dollar cheap. Researchers at Columbia University claim the mChip has a 100 percent detection rate, although there's a four to six percent chance of getting a false positive -- a stat similar to traditional lab tests. As you'd likely expect, there's hope that the inexpensive mChip will help testing efforts in places like Africa to detect HIV before it turns into AIDS. Next stop: the self-service pharmacy at CVS?

Sunday, October 2, 2011

interesting read...

ASHP National Survey Tracks Pharmacy Trends Over Time
Mar 28, 2011 No Comments Print
OVER THE YEARS, ASHP’s National Survey of Health-System Pharmacy Practice has evolved into a powerful tool to track pharmacy developments. The results of the survey, which monitors both micro- and macrotrends, help highlight changes that can feel almost glacial in pace but that are critical to the profession’s future.
“Although we publish the overarching results of the survey in the American Journal of Health- System Pharmacy (AJHP) each year, the article alone doesn’t capture the trends over longer periods of time,” said Douglas Scheckelhoff, M.S., FASHP, ASHP’s vice president of professional development. “When you stand back and look at the larger picture, you see some startling and exciting changes in the profession.”
The survey, which has its roots in the Mirror to Hospital Pharmacy (published in 1964), was first fielded by ASHP in 1975. What initially began as an occasional survey, occurring once every few years, has become an annual effort at data collection. The new survey will appear in the April 15 issue of AJHP.
Since 1990, the survey has documented three important trends in health-system pharmacy: the influence of The Joint Commission (TJC’s) on national safety standards, the growth of technology in pharmacy practice, and the evolution of roles for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians.
Guiding Pharmacists, Policymakers, Stakeholders
Each year, approximately half of the survey focuses on two of six aspects of the medication-use system: prescribing, transcribing, dispensing, administration, monitoring, and patient education. The other half comprises of standard questions about staffing or current hot topics and evolving issues, such as informatics or the environmental impact of drug disposal.
The consistency of the survey’s questions gives it clout, according to Craig A. Pedersen, Ph.D., Pharm.D., FAPhA, a health care consultant in Mercer Island, Wash., and lead author of the forthcoming practice report in AJHP’s April issue.
“Our methods have been maintained over time, including the weighting and phrasing of the questions, and we’ve had a consistent team of investigators, so the trends are very likely real,” Pedersen said. “This survey is a trusted source of information not only to our profession, but to policymakers and other stakeholders.”
Pharmacists Respond to TJC
In recent years, survey responses have reflected the impact of TJC’s medication safety guidance. For example, after TJC announced national patient safety goals, the number of hospitals in which pharmacists read back verbal orders in detail, including spelling the drug’s name, increased from 30 percent of respondents to more than 83 percent of respondents within five years.
In 2006, 59 percent of hospital pharmacies did not offer after-hours review of orders. Now only 43 percent of hospital pharmacies do not perform after-hours review. There also has been a growth in the number of facilities that have affiliation agreements with other hospitals for order review and remote pharmacy services.
Hospital and health-system pharmacy has changed markedly in the years since ASHP first started surveying pharmacists about their practices. Photos courtesy of ASHP Archives.
“When The Joint Commission gets involved, hospitals step up to the plate with new processes,” said Pedersen. He noted the impact of TJC guidelines on medication reconciliation. “The Commission said we need to perform medication reconciliation, and now everyone is doing that,” he said. “The survey has enabled us to document our progress.”
Expanding Reach of Technology
ASHP’s national survey has captured a second pronounced trend: the growth of technology. In 2010, 34.5 percent of hospitals had adopted bar code medication administration, compared with just 1.5 percent in 2002. In 2010, 18.9 percent of hospitals had adopted computerized prescriber order entry with clinical decision support, compared with 2.7 percent in 2003.
Although seven- and eight-year trends demonstrate growth, longer trends illustrate just how far the use of technology in pharmacy has come, Scheckelhoff said.
“Think about computerization of the hospital pharmacy. In 1982, only 17.6 percent of hospital pharmacies were computerized. Now, virtually all are,” he said. Scheckelhoff noted that the near universal use of automated dispensing cabinets reflects the shift toward unit-dose drug distribution.
“All of these technologies improve efficiency and safety, and we’re able to take the information the survey provides about their use in forming practice models, to make sure these technologies are used to maximum effect,” Scheckelhoff added.
Changing Roles
The growth of technology has positively affected how pharmacists and pharmacy technicians go about their work, according to the survey.
“One could imagine technology replacing people, but we’ve seen the opposite,” said Scheckelhoff. “Technicians are doing more for prepping and distribution of medications, while pharmacists are moving into advanced roles with more direct patient care, such as working in the ER and going on patient care rounds.”
In 1982, pharmacists went on rounds in 13 percent of hospitals. Now, pharmacists go on rounds at 43 percent of hospitals overall and in nearly all hospitals that have 300 beds or more.
Philip J. Schneider, M.S., FASHP, clinical professor and associate dean at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy in Phoenix, notes the increase in pharmacists’ responsibilities.
“Pharmacists are being delegated responsibility for prescribing or making changes in drug therapy without necessarily having to get physician approval, and we think that’s important,” Schneider said.
“The survey has shown us that there is a shift away from labor-intensive activities and toward pharmacist empowerment in terms of drug therapy management,” he said. “It’s clear that this is a vision for a lot of pharmacists, and it shows how hospitals are increasingly making better use of their pharmacists’ time to achieve that vision.”

http://www.ashpintersections.org/2011/03/use-of-technology-growing-pharmacists-roles-changing/